A new FreightWaves analysis argues that English-language proficiency (ELP) violations aren’t isolated paperwork issues — they track closely with wider safety red flags at the carrier level. The takeaway for fleets: when drivers are written up for failing to communicate in English at the roadside, those carriers are more likely to be tangled up in other qualification and compliance problems that raise their overall risk profile.
That finding lands just as state enforcement is in flux. In a response filed to federal officials, Washington state said it will begin placing drivers out of service for ELP failures by the end of October, a pivot that follows a federal warning that threatened its Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program dollars. Washington acknowledged coding mistakes in earlier inspections and told FMCSA it is retraining inspectors; the state’s plan is now under review by the agency. New Mexico has already shifted to out‑of‑service enforcement, while California has not — setting up a high-stakes test of federal–state alignment.
The money at stake is real. Washington notes it is slated to receive roughly $10 million in MCSAP funds this year — money that supports a quarter of its commercial-vehicle safety workforce. Losing those dollars would blunt inspection capacity just as new ELP enforcement is taking hold.
On the ground, some jurisdictions are already tightening the net. A joint dragnet by the Colorado State Patrol and the Wyoming Highway Patrol on September 30 took 16 drivers and 24 vehicles out of service for a range of violations; among the arrests were repeat offenders — including one driver cited multiple times for failing the ELP standard. It’s an early sign that ELP checks are being embedded alongside familiar roadside priorities like licensing and medical qualifications.
Why this matters for carriers: ELP violations now trigger immediate out‑of‑service orders in most states, sidelining equipment and stranding freight until a qualified driver can be dispatched. That creates cascading costs — missed delivery windows, detention, and reputational damage with shippers. Insurers and procurement teams also watch inspection histories; a pattern of driver-qualification issues can push a carrier down routing guides or bump premiums, even if crash histories are clean.
What to do now:
– Audit driver files against current enforcement realities. If you rely on multilingual hiring pipelines or third‑party recruiters, add an ELP screen before road tests.
– Train dispatchers and safety staff on what inspectors will ask and how to document proficiency in everyday operations (trip notes, DVIRs, shipper check-in procedures).
– Build contingency plans so a nearby, qualified driver can recover a load if someone is placed out of service at the roadside.
– Align with counsel on anti‑discrimination boundaries: validate English for safety-critical tasks without straying beyond what regulations require.
The industry has spent years debating whether language checks move the safety needle. Regardless of that debate, the operational reality is changing quickly. Carriers that treat ELP as part of core driver fitness — not an edge case — will be better positioned as states tighten enforcement and federal agencies scrutinize outcomes.
Sources: FreightWaves, Overdrive, Transport Topics
This article was prepared exclusively for TruckStopInsider.com. Republishing is permitted only with proper credit and a link back to the original source.
