Trailer maker Wabash has reached a settlement that ends a closely watched “nuclear verdict” lawsuit stemming from a 2019 underride crash, turning what had once been a $462 million courtroom threat into a $30 million payout. The agreement, disclosed in a recent securities filing and reported Oct. 15, trims the company’s out-of-pocket exposure as insurance picks up additional costs, according to coverage by Trucking Dive. The filing also said Wabash will reverse $81.2 million of a prior legal charge that it recorded after last year’s jury award.
The settlement draws a line under a case that rattled equipment manufacturers and fleets alike. A St. Louis jury in September 2024 had delivered $450 million in punitive damages and $12 million in compensatories before a Missouri court cut the punitive portion to $108 million in March. While those prior figures are historical, the Oct. 15 disclosure confirms the parties have now agreed to end the fight, with plaintiffs and beneficiaries dropping further challenges as part of the deal. For risk managers, the headline is less about the original verdict and more about the endgame: a negotiated number, largely shielded by insurance, that restores balance-sheet clarity.
Why it matters for trucking: even when fleets do everything right, catastrophic verdicts can migrate up the supply chain and land on equipment makers — often years after a trailer rolls off the line. This case became a bellwether for that exposure. The newly disclosed terms suggest three practical takeaways for carriers and OEMs: scrutinize indemnity clauses and evidence-preservation language in purchase and maintenance agreements; document spec choices and retrofit decisions around safety equipment; and coordinate early with insurers to map coverage layers before a dispute escalates. Those moves won’t stop lawsuits, but they can narrow the financial blast radius when claims go nuclear.
The timing also intersects with strategy. As the legal cloud lifts, Wabash is leaning harder into services that can smooth cyclicality and diversify revenue. On Oct. 15, Transport Topics reported the company is expanding its Trailers-as-a-Service platform — adding new “TaaS Pools” and “TaaS Plus” options and growing the fleet available to customers — while opening parts and service centers to deepen aftermarket support. That pivot toward recurring services and lifecycle monetization could help offset litigation and insurance volatility that’s grown more common across the industry.
For insurance markets, the settlement underscores a trend underwriters have been signaling to fleets for months: limits still respond, but retentions, exclusions and cooperation clauses matter more than ever. Expect renewal conversations to probe rear-impact guard specs, maintenance intervals, telematics data, driver monitoring and any retrofit programs. Fleets that can surface clean documentation and show proactive safety investments generally fare better on terms and pricing.
Bottom line: The Wabash case won’t end the era of nuclear verdicts, but it shows how outsized awards can ultimately be negotiated down — and how comprehensive insurance programs and disciplined documentation can keep a catastrophic claim from becoming an existential one.
Sources: FreightWaves, Trucking Dive, Transport Topics
This article was prepared exclusively for TruckStopInsider.com. Republishing is permitted only with proper credit and a link back to the original source.
